Tyler's Attempt: Spot On or Dead Wrong?

Submitted on May 22, 2013 by  ConnieLJohnson

I’ll be the first person to admit that I am not a huge fan of Tyler Perry’s projects therefore I had no interest in viewing his newest film Temptation. Less than a week after the movie’s release, a social media storm of criticism surfaced rebuking Mr. Perry for the film’s imagery of people living with HIV/AIDS. Amid this controversy, I attended a conference call which included people living with HIV/AIDS and professionals within the field. The call was designed to discuss and unpack what the film’s imagery means to and for the HIV/AIDS community. Of course I couldn’t add any useful, informed commentary to the conversation because I hadn’t seen the movie, nor did I have any plans on seeing it. However, after attending a different movie screening focused solely on African American women I reluctantly decided to see Mr. Perry’s latest project. The movie screening I attended sparked concern because even in a documentary primarily concerning the plight of African American women the narrative of HIV/AIDS was being told through the voices of either HIV negative African American women who worked with positive women or others outside of this unique demographic who feel somehow qualified to speak on our behalf.

According to the conversation I heard on the conference call, I gathered that if nothing else, Temptation could potentially instigate some open, honest dialogues among African American women living with and affected by HIV/AIDS about identifying our specific needs and how to get those needs met. So the day after the call, I hesitantly paid $7.25 and settled into a practically empty Black owned theatre in Chicago to watch Mr. Perry’s latest attempt to entertain American movie goers.

My initial response to the film was of artistic criticism that has little to do with the subject matter at hand so I won’t bore you with my commentary. I admit I that recognized the themes that some within the HIV/AIDS community could view as problematic within the main characters of the movie. According to the conversations I’d previously heard, I was under the impression that there were only two HIV positive people in the movie, the lead female and her seductive love interest. However, I was surprised to find that there was a third person in the film who was portrayed quite accurately. In the midst of this unfolding story of passion and discontentment was Brandy Norwood’s character, an African American woman who had been infected with HIV by her boyfriend. This woman was portrayed as broken but determined to redefine her life on her own terms. She relocated to a new city, found a job, and established a new life while working through the emotional and mental anguish that often comes along with a positive diagnosis. When approached romantically she readily and responsibly disclosed her status. Without blaming herself she actively considered how she MIGHT have contributed to her diagnosis and surrounded herself with supportive people who were willing to emotionally support her while she worked through the difficult process of accepting and living with a positive diagnosis.

This character I have described is the most accurate depiction of an African American woman living with HIV/AIDS that I have ever seen in any major media outlet or any outlet for that matter. Even among the medical and psychological field, African American women living with HIV/AIDS are reduced to current or former drug users, sex workers and or welfare queens who display little or no autonomy. These biased views of women are destructive in creating and establishing programming designed to treat, prevent and serve a very unique population whose input is rarely considered in the creation of such programs. Confronting HIV/AIDS among African American women without addressing how their environment might predispose them to the virus is futile. Mass incarceration, disrupted family structures\relationships, poverty, limited access to health care and lack of quality housing are rarely mentioned in discussing the alarmingly increasing HIV rates among African American women. Mothers, sisters, aunts, grandmothers, and friends continue to be excluded from the discussions of how to address an epidemic that greatly affects them. These women are courageous, resilient and display monumental amounts of fortitude just to survive from day to day and deserve to be heard. Like Brandy’s character, most African American women living with HIV/AIDS desire to improve their quality of life and be recognized as the audacious humans they are. Tyler Perry is one of the first and only African Americans connected to Hollywood to bring forth issues that most directors and actors have strayed from and for that, I applaud him. Do his movies always hit the mark of tackling these issues? Maybe not but I there is something to be said about his willingness to portray segments of the HIV/AIDS community that are often shunned and\or left behind when major decisions are being made.

Submitted by David

You totally missed the point. You may see the Brandy character as positive, but she is also portrayed and untouchable and unlovable. How could you not see that?

Submitted by David

David your comment makes my point clearly...Because I don't view this character the same you do my views aren't valid in your eyes. This kind of dismissal takes place within the HIV/AIDS community regularly and until there is a space created where everyone infected and affected has a say about how to address this epidemic we will continue to have new infections. All views should be respected even if they differ from your own. I totally understand and see how you might come to the conclusion that Brandy's character was portrayed as unlovable but I just happen to disagree. Aren't I allowed to do that?

Submitted by David

Amazing. I am work in HIV prevention and constantly think about the environmental context of HIV risk. By ignoring these structural factors, we place all the responsibility for prevention with the individual, meaning that we can assign blame if a person doesn't take "appropriate" prevention methods and becomes infected. But the sad truth is that risk is structured differently based on the social identity you were born into. I am a white woman and have taken risks with my health that could have spelt out something far graver for me had I been born in a poorer community with less health care access and a higher viral load (we all know that infectivity is mediated by viral suppression). I'm sorry for rambling - I just thought you hit on something important with your article. Please keep fighting, and stay well.


Submitted by David

Megan thank you for your comment. I believe there is a real danger in trying to treat, prevent, and serve HIV/AIDS solely from a medical view without taking structural and socially constructed conditions that have been proven to contribute to the concentrated incidences among Brown and Black communities, especially poor communities of color. As long as there are people out there like you willing to consider other possibilities and means I will continue to fight.

Submitted by David

i like your view about Tiler Perry's movie i watched it last week and it iterally made me cry and i have been hiv positive for the past 7 years without any medication but it still made me cry.

ConnieLJohnson 's recent blog posts


Members of The Well Project community at USCHA 2022.

Become a Member

Join our community and become a member to find support and connect to other women living with HIV.

Join now >


Do you get our newsletter?

¿Recibe nuestro boletín?

Sign up for our monthly Newsletter and get the latest info in your inbox.

Suscríbase a nuestro boletín mensual y reciba la información más reciente en su bandeja de entrada.

Browse Blogs by Theme

Recent Blog Posts

Our Bloggers